Directed by: Michael Hazanavicius
Starring: Jean Dujardin, Berenice Bejo, John Goodman, James
Cromwell, Penlope Ann Miller
Review: Movies have
always been viewed as an art form. Just like
any other form of artistic expression, movies have had a power of us. They have had an ability to evoke emotion
like no other art form. No matter the
iteration, movies have always held a place in our hearts. This is what ‘The Artist’ is about.
As a narrative, ‘The Artist’ follows our protagonist George
(Dujardin) and his journey from silent film star to obscurity. Starting out in 1927 George is the biggest
thing going. As a silent film star there
are few who can rival his level of fame.
He is the biggest star the studio has to offer. His world is also about to change.
The longtime director of George’s films has shown him the “future”
of movies: what will come to be known as “talkies.” George laughs this off as a passing fad at
the most. There is no way that the movie
going public would turn its back on silent films and their stars (like
George). George is so confident that he
is such a big star and the public loves him so much that there is no way these
new type of movies will catch on.
George turns out to be more wrong than he possibly could
have imagined. A young woman that he
helped establish, Peppy Miller (Bejo), has used “talkies” to make herself a
star. She has aligned herself with the
studio as one of their “young stars.”
Part of the “young stars” movement carries with it an “out with the old”
mentality. This means George is on his
way out. By 1929 and the stock market
crash, his career is nearly over. George
has no money to his name, his wife has left him, and his film career is all but
nonexistent.
This is where the movie gets the majority of its meat. Dissecting George’s relationship with his
fame and Peppy is where most of the emotionality comes from. ‘The Artist’ took a bold step and decided to
make itself a silent film. What the
movie has in its favor is that it is a silent made as if it’s 2011, and not
made as if it were 1927. It even pokes
fun at itself by bringing to light the fact that characters would be “mugging
for the camera” in old silent films.
There is none of that here. It is
a commandment to Dujardin’s acting skills that he is able to emote with such
ability without using any words. It’s
truly a testament to all actors’ talent that they can get their point across
without using any words.
More so than the choice of dialogue or no dialogue, what
makes the movie better is the use of the themes involved. George fancies himself an artist. What he doesn’t realize is that his hubris
has gotten in the way of his art. The
movie going public hasn’t turned on George, they’ve turned on his art
form. Silent films were great because
they provided the sense of awe that only films can provide as an art form. When that got lost, with actors not really
being in character and just “mugging for the camera,” the public wanted the
next big thing. That was the “talkies.”
George’s relationship that he’s developed with Peppy is
tested by all of this. He has fallen in
love with her (as has all of America), yet he is not sure how to handle their
situation. While she provides for him a
feeling that has been missing from his life, she also represents his
failure. More than that, she represents
the fact that his failure was the product of his own doing.
George was too arrogant to realize that he had lost his
artform. He was too egotistical to
understand that people weren’t responding to him anymore because he was no
longer providing people with what they crave.
Further than that, he was too ignorant to accept that his life got to
that point through his own fault.
It’s this dynamic that makes the film undeniably
watchable. While the majority of the
cache the film has is related to its novelty, there is a quality film in
here. Some of it doesn’t quite resonate
the best due to the music choices that are made through the film. This is an inherent limitation of the genre
that makes it an issue when you’re trying to sympathize with the
characters. At times it can be hard to
be drawn into a scene when the music doesn’t fit the mood the actors are
portraying. It’s a seemingly small issue
but is magnified with film of this type.
All in all, this is a movie that is worth your time, if not
for the novelty alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment